Dendrophilous
Scriniary
Writing & the Revision Process 
12th-Jan-2004 08:28 pm [revision, writing_process]
trees_fond
Finished the description and characterization in chapter 18. On to chapter 19 and 17.

I'm calling it 45 minutes of writing, even though it took an hour, because I got up to get an orange and tea and because there's now an intricate multicolored doodle in the corner of page 8. I'm now nearly one day ahead of schedule for the week. 4:15 left.


Are you close to finishing this current revision so you'll leave it alone for a while before going back into it? Or is there one more read through to go?

The former, thankfully. It's a multi-step writing process:

1. First draft, which was handwritten

2.a. Type in the first draft, making mostly minor changes - putting the parts where I was writing really quickly into actual English, for example.

2.b. Add lots of new scenes and expand the old scenes. I had to add a lot of plot. That is, I'd be writing chapter 11 and realize that X had to happen in chapter 5, so I put a note on the outline to add a scene where X happened when I revised chapter 5. Often that meant adding mentions of X to scenes in chapters 6 through 10. Or, I might realize I had mentioned a character in chapter 6, needed him again in chapter 17, and had forgotten he existed in the intervening chapters. This is why the first draft was about 60k words, and the second is nearly 100k.

3. Print out and make more changes, again mostly to plot. then type them in. This is where I am supposed to notice inconsistencies like having the same conversation in chapters 16 and 17, or that the characters already know Y and I had forgotten.

4. Description and Characterization. Because I never remember to put it in earlier, because I worry more about the plot. And it's completely obvious to me what the characters are thinking and feeling, because that's where the plot comes from. So I go through the chapter, either on screen or printed out, and add stuff.

5. Polish. This is where I have my MSWord macro highlight the dozen or so words I use too much, and I go through and change as many of them as possible. Also I spellcheck, especially the character names. I also read the whole chapter, sometimes out loud, and try to make it sound like it was written by a writer, not a five-year-old with a crayon.

Right now, I am doing steps 4 and 5. Chapters 17 and 18 just need to be polished, and chapters 19 and 20 need to go through step 4 and then step 5.

Then, I will rewrite one scene in chapter 13 (because I screwed up), and rewrite chapter 1. Then I will declare the second draft to be done, and let it sit for some time (don't know how long yet) before I go on to draft 3.

Draft 3 will involve reading the whole thing through like a real book, then revising it backwards. Right now the end is much much better written than the beginning. I've learned a lot in two years. The first half has almost no description in it. I also want to make sure my maps are consistent.

If nothing else, it sounds like it's getting more and more polished, but at what point do you decide that you're done? I have a hard enough time proclaiming that the code I write is finished and I'm usually forced to conceed because of a dealine or a commitment... But with just writing for yourself, it's in perpetual "improvement mode" isn't it?

After draft 3, I will be asking people to read it again. Then depending on what they say, I will either revise it some more, send it to publishers and agents, or burn it.

There are probably always going to be things I can do to make it better, but I'm getting kind of sick of it and there are more things I want to write. I don't think I'll have any problem saying it's finally done.

Oh, and next time, I am doing more of the revision while I am actually writing the book, instead of leaving it all for the end. It's hard work and the first draft is more fun, so I want to spread it out a little.
Comments 
12th-Jan-2004 08:40 pm (UTC)
OK, so I've read bits and pieces about this book now. And I've also read along with your blog and such. If you burn it before I can actually read it I am going to be crushed. My curiousity is piqued. It sounds very interesting to me and I'm holding out to get to read it. Maybe by the time you get done with Draft 3 I'll have some free time.
12th-Jan-2004 09:35 pm (UTC)
I second laydamnesty's comment :)

I was fortunate enough to read the first 6 chapters what...almost 2 years ago? Back when it was the very very first draft or so and it was good then. I remember alot of the comments I've made for you and I'm itching to see how it's been revised. I have all of the orignal chapters, either on my computer at home or at work :)

So don't burn it! And please please please let me be one of the people that you ask to read the 3rd draft :) Hell...if you decide to chuck it, I'll print and bind your 3rd draft so I can sell it on ebay or whatever is around when you become famous :)

I can see how you can become kind of sick of it though. Being a perfectionist is easy....knowing when to stop is something that's hard...at least for us coders and I'm sure it's the same for you writers.

13th-Jan-2004 05:39 am (UTC)
Back when it was the very very first draft or so/ Second draft. And the first few chapters had be revised *a lot* just to get to the second draft.

I guess it should be reassuring that, even though the beginning of the second draft is so awful, I can now write stuff that's much better even before I revise it.
13th-Jan-2004 09:30 am (UTC)
Well that's good :)

I'd personally be nervous about showing my stuff to other people you know? I can take criticism but it's like someone critiquing a chef for his cooking when that person can't cook that well in the first place. I can write reviews of movies and stuff but when it's someone I know like with you, I had to mentally put aside my relationship to you before telling you what I thought and hope that you won't go "...yeah yeah yeah....let's see how well YOU can do!" when you hear what I have to say :)

Though at least for me, I really can't just send you a piece of code that I wrote going "Look! Isn't this so elegant! What a beautiful piece of code!" :)
13th-Jan-2004 05:54 pm (UTC)
I'm nervous about showing my writing, but if I don't, I'll never know everything that's wrong with it. Better to be told that it stinks now than when a publisher rejects it.
1st-Feb-2004 01:46 pm (UTC) - Re:
Anonymous
On rafsc you said some people now were saying the book needs more work. What about the people who liked it before? Have they seen the current version?

What you posted about the students going to the funeral was very good, it just needed a very little touchup.

R.L.
1st-Feb-2004 01:54 pm (UTC) - Re:
Some people (waves at t_arai) are less picky than others. :) He was very confused about what was going on.

The bit about the funeral is something from the second half of the book, which is much better than the first half.
13th-Jan-2004 01:18 am (UTC)
This is really useful - thanks.
13th-Jan-2004 05:33 am (UTC)
I'm not sure "useful" is the best word for it. "Crazy", maybe.
13th-Jan-2004 06:15 am (UTC)
Not at all. It's actually rather heartening to see the immense amount of work that goes into it and realise that one can't actually expect to get it right first time.

I recently bought a book called Revision: A Creative Approach to Writing and Rewriting Fiction, by David Michael Kaplan. Of course, I'm still waiting until I have something to revise...
13th-Jan-2004 05:51 pm (UTC)
Oh, that looks interesting. I'll add it to my list.
This page was loaded Nov 8th 2009, 10:54 pm GMT.